Archive for the ‘Viewpoint’ Category

Guest Post: Fighting Fat with Drugs – Is it Worth It?

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

It’s no longer a trivial issue over which kids get bullied in the school playground or which adults get teased about at the office; today, obesity is an epidemic of oversized proportions. It’s a chronic disease, one that 12 million Americans are suffering from, and because of this, illness is on the rise. Diabetes, heart disease, strokes, cancer, and various other diseases are on the prowl and sending healthcare costs shooting through the roof. And while anyone with plain common sense knows that the best and safest way to fight obesity is to eat a healthy diet and get regular exercise over the course of your life, most people tend to resort to shortcuts and seek remedy in anti-obesity drugs.

To be fair, some people do need extra help since diet and exercise alone cannot do much to help them reduce because they are abnormally obese. And so weight loss pills help them control and/or suppress their appetite or prevent their bodies from digesting the fat in the food they eat. But a recent study conducted by Brazilian and Canadian researchers and published in the British Medical Journal states that even the long term use of weight loss pills contributes only to a minor reduction in weight, an average of less than 11 pounds.

And when we take into consideration the number of side effects that these pills cause – the anti-obesity drug orlistat which is supposed to boost weight loss by preventing your body from digesting fats causes digestive side effects even as it promotes only an average weight loss of 7 pounds; sibutramine and rimonabant which suppress or interrupt neural signals to disguise hunger pangs and food cravings reduce weight by an average of 9 pounds, but at the cost of insomnia, high blood pressure, an elevated pulse rate, and nausea. Rimonabant has also been known to cause anxiety and depression and other mood disorders and is as of now not approved for sale by the FDA.

On the bright side however, the drugs did serve to improve cardiovascular health and prevent and/or control diabetes, hypertension, and cholesterol, the killer diseases that attack overweight people. But then again, with most weight loss drugs being available OTC, we must ask ourselves the question – is it ok to tempt and even court the disease just because we perceive that the cure is just a pill away? And are we fooling ourselves into believing that it is ok to be overweight because anti-obesity medicines are now available even without a prescription?

The truth cannot be written more clearly on the wall – we are a nation plagued by obesity; we invite disease with open arms because of our irresponsible lifestyles, a callous attitude towards exercise, and an overindulgence of food. And because of this, our healthcare costs are spiraling out of control. It’s time we stopped depending on pills and medicines as the panacea to cure all our ills and start looking at their source instead; it’s time we bring up our children to respect and safeguard their health instead of encouraging their sedentary lifestyles and feeding them with junk food; and it’s time we started giving good health the deference it deserves – we don’t have to place it on a pedestal, it’s enough that we acknowledge its importance in our lives.

(This article is contributed by Susan White, who regularly writes on the subject of online radiology technician schools. She invites your questions, comments at her email address: susan.white33@gmail.com)

Guest Post: Do Drugs Cause More Harm Than Good?

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

Life is very different today from what it was half a century ago. We have achieved more progress in the last fifty years in every aspect of life than in the hundred years preceding them. Yes, technology has made our lives much more convenient, but as with all forms of progress, we are both limited and boosted by the rapid creation of various kinds of drugs. The average life expectancy today has gone up by a decade when compared to what it was fifty years ago. It’s no big deal to live to be 80 or more today, and with drugs available for every ailment under the sun, it’s easy to prolong life in more ways than one.

But if we stop to think for a moment, we would realize the fact that medicines sometimes cause more harm than good, mostly because of our ignorance or because we abuse them knowingly. Take for instance a person who has been prescribed painkillers for a debilitating condition like a headache; seven times out of ten, you can bet that the patient takes them for more than the prescribed amount of time or uses these pills randomly even for perceived symptoms of pain. Some people become so addicted to painkillers that they suffer a relapse if they’re forced to stop. Painkillers have powerful chemicals that affect not just your digestive tract but also your overall physical and mental health.

While this is an instance of substance abuse, ignorance comes to the fore when we’re prescribed antibiotics or any other medication that must be taken for a certain period of time even if you feel better or the symptoms of disease are no longer present. Most people stop taking them when they feel ok, and because of this, variant and new strains of bacteria are formed and cause many more new diseases. Also, some people tend to dose themselves with antibiotics even for colds and other viral infections, thus setting themselves up for various health problems.

Be it the habitual pill popper or the compulsive addict, neither behavior bodes well for progress in the pharmaceutical world. The demand for drugs has also given rise to hundreds of spurious manufacturing units, most of which churn out OTC medicines that end up harming or even taking lives.

In order to maximize the efficiency of drugs and ensure that they do more good than harm, we must:

  • Take them only with a prescription.
  • Never use them beyond the recommended period or dosage.
  • Never self-medicate.
  • Never get into the habit of popping a pill for any perceived ailment.
  • Always check for expiry dates and authenticity of the drug.

A little common sense goes a long way in making medicine effective and safe.

This article is contributed by Ashley M. Jones, who regularly writes on the subject of Online Pharmacy Technician Certification. She invites your questions, comments at her email address: ashleym.jones643@gmail.com

The Definition of Pandemic

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Guest Post:

The word pandemic has been thrown around in recent years because of the prevalence of many major illnesses that have occurred throughout the third world nations as well as even many Western nations. However, the recent Swine Flu outbreak has caused much deliberation as to the proper terminology of the word itself.

There have been generations of widespread epidemics in the past that have included influenza, cholera, and a multitude of other diseases. However, the World Health Organization has come up with a six-tiered level in which to determine when to implement specific disease control efforts around the world, which has successfully led to many countries quarantining illnesses which could be easily spread abroad. However, the true definition of a pandemic is not delivered by the WHO nor can medical journals accurately define it as well. Rather, the general public is on its own to determine what a pandemic ensues, as it implies the “rapid spread of an infectious disease to many countries”. However, the severity of pandemics vary with each disease, and not every country is affected when an outbreak occurs.

Additionally, the variety of different illnesses affects the overall terminology of the word; scientists and doctors alike are still unsure as to how pandemics arise, how they spread, and why they vary in their lethality. The background of the originating country has a lot to do with the severity and contamination of the impending illness and helps contribute to the overall definition of a pandemic. The recent Swine Flu outbreak has increased concerns over the spread of a disease within these “Western nations” which otherwise were remarkably protected from threat of outside illnesses that could infiltrate these nations. The fact that the United States was one of the first countries to report signs of such a disease caused the WHO to scramble to upgrade their alert system in order to properly take care of this problem. It is unfortunate that it takes a Western nation to cause this much concern over an illness, while many African nations have been experiencing similar epidemics. The new limelight on these Western nations is solely due to the international trade that occurs within many of these nations, which therefore caused the disease to be spread throughout Europe, Asia, and Australia.

This new illness caused the WHO much stress as to a proper cure for the illness as well as a way in which to quarantine travelers from disease-ridden countries. While the illness can be treated with regular flu remedies, the fact that so many outside the tradition flu age group were coming down with the illness and succumbing to its side effects caused the WHO to take drastic measures and qualify it (perhaps prematurely) as a pandemic. This recent flu outbreak is vastly different from any earlier outbreaks which may be labeled as “true” pandemics, but this type of definition is forever changing and it may take another widespread illness before we can determine what is the proper scenario in which to classify as a pandemic.

This post was contributed by Meredith Walker, (Online nursing schools). She welcomes your feedback at MeredithWalker1983 at gmail.com

References: WHO Pandemic Phase Descriptions (pdf)

Food for Thought

Monday, November 17th, 2008

What if HIV mutates and can now be transmitted by sneezing and coughing – just like common cold??

What would this graph look like?

HIV/AIDS - people living with HIV/AIDS by Country

 

Electric cars and Global Warming

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

Do you think electric cars are less polluting then regular cars. Think again.

The electric car has not come of age, because more than half of the electricity in this country (USA) is currently generated with coal – the dirtiest of fossil fuels.

- Comment in Time Magazine (Oct 13, 2008 issue)

WhoKilledtheElectricCar.jpg

Ten years later – we may be asking the same question. Again.